Skip to main content

Why Sagemaker is highlighted as Infrastructure layer

 

 SageMaker: SageMaker is called an Infrastructure Layer because it provides raw computing resources, model training capabilities, and deep control over ML workloads, requiring technical expertise to manage.

1️⃣ Direct Control Over Compute & Models

  • SageMaker provides full control over infrastructure, allowing data scientists and ML engineers to train, fine-tune, and deploy models using dedicated compute resources (e.g., GPU instances).
  • Users choose instance types, frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch, MXNet), and manually configure infrastructure settings.

2️⃣ Custom Model Training & Deployment

  • Users can bring their own models or fine-tune pre-trained models with custom datasets.
  • SageMaker provides end-to-end model lifecycle management, from data processing to monitoring deployed models.

3️⃣ Requires ML Expertise & Engineering Effort

  • SageMaker is designed for data scientists, ML engineers, and developers who need deep control over model performance, tuning, and infrastructure optimizations.
  • It is not a no-code/low-code solution—users must configure ML pipelines, data preparation, and model training.

 Bedrock: Amazon Bedrock is called a Middle Layer because it abstracts ML infrastructure complexities and provides AI capabilities as an easy-to-use API, sitting between raw compute (SageMaker) and AI-powered business applications.

1️⃣ Pre-Built Foundation Models (FMs) as a Service

  • Unlike SageMaker, Bedrock does not require managing infrastructure.
  • It offers pre-trained generative AI models (Anthropic Claude, Amazon Titan, Meta Llama, etc.) that can be used directly via APIs.

2️⃣ No Need for Model Training or Fine-Tuning (But Possible)

  • Bedrock allows businesses to consume AI models via API calls without the need for training infrastructure.
  • However, fine-tuning is possible via RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) or custom data tuning, but the complexity is hidden from users.

3️⃣ Built for Business & Application Integration

  • Designed for software developers, business users, and enterprises that want to integrate generative AI quickly without dealing with ML complexities.
  • Provides guardrails, security, and compliance features for enterprise adoption.


🔹 How to Position This for Senior Leaders?

SageMaker is for AI builders who need full control over models, training, and infrastructure. It’s like renting a data center where you configure everything.


Bedrock is for businesses that want to use AI without worrying about infrastructure. It’s like consuming AI as a plug-and-play service, similar to how we use SaaS applications.

Think of SageMaker as AWS EC2 (compute for ML) and Bedrock as a managed AI SaaS, like OpenAI's ChatGPT API.


🔹 Key Analogy to Explain to Senior Leaders

FeatureSageMaker (Infrastructure Layer)Bedrock (Middle Layer)
Who Uses It?Data Scientists, ML EngineersDevelopers, Business Users
CustomizationFull control over training & infraPre-trained models with API access
Model OptionsCustom models & pre-trained modelsFully managed GenAI models
Infrastructure ManagementRequired (compute, storage, scaling)Hidden from users (fully managed)
Ease of UseRequires ML expertiseNo ML expertise needed
Use CaseCustom AI/ML developmentFast AI integration into apps

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between Elastic and Enterprise Redis w.r.t "Hybrid Query" capabilities

  We'll explore scenarios involving nested queries, aggregations, custom scoring, and hybrid queries that combine multiple search criteria. 1. Nested Queries ElasticSearch Example: ElasticSearch supports nested documents, which allows for querying on nested fields with complex conditions. Query: Find products where the product has a review with a rating of 5 and the review text contains "excellent". { "query": { "nested": { "path": "reviews", "query": { "bool": { "must": [ { "match": { "reviews.rating": 5 } }, { "match": { "reviews.text": "excellent" } } ] } } } } } Redis Limitation: Redis does not support nested documents natively. While you can store nested structures in JSON documents using the RedisJSON module, querying these nested structures with complex condi...

Training LLM model requires more GPU RAM than storing same LLM

Storing an LLM model and training the same model both require memory, but the memory requirements for training are typically higher than just storing the model. Let's dive into the details: Memory Requirement for Storing the Model: When you store an LLM model, you need to save the weights of the model parameters. Each parameter is typically represented by a 32-bit float (4 bytes). The memory requirement for storing the model weights is calculated by multiplying the number of parameters by 4 bytes. For example, if you have a model with 1 billion parameters, the memory requirement for storing the model weights alone would be 4 GB (4 bytes * 1 billion parameters). Memory Requirement for Training: During the training process, additional components use GPU memory in addition to the model weights. These components include optimizer states, gradients, activations, and temporary variables needed by the training process. These components can require additional memory beyond just storing th...

Error: could not find function "read.xlsx" while reading .xlsx file in R

Got this during the execution of following command in R > dat Error: could not find function "read.xlsx" Tried following command > install.packages("xlsx", dependencies = TRUE) Installing package into ‘C:/Users/amajumde/Documents/R/win-library/3.2’ (as ‘lib’ is unspecified) also installing the dependencies ‘rJava’, ‘xlsxjars’ trying URL 'https://cran.rstudio.com/bin/windows/contrib/3.2/rJava_0.9-8.zip' Content type 'application/zip' length 766972 bytes (748 KB) downloaded 748 KB trying URL 'https://cran.rstudio.com/bin/windows/contrib/3.2/xlsxjars_0.6.1.zip' Content type 'application/zip' length 9485170 bytes (9.0 MB) downloaded 9.0 MB trying URL 'https://cran.rstudio.com/bin/windows/contrib/3.2/xlsx_0.5.7.zip' Content type 'application/zip' length 400968 bytes (391 KB) downloaded 391 KB package ‘rJava’ successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked package ‘xlsxjars’ successfully unpacked ...