Skip to main content

Why Sagemaker is highlighted as Infrastructure layer

 

✅ SageMaker: SageMaker is called an Infrastructure Layer because it provides raw computing resources, model training capabilities, and deep control over ML workloads, requiring technical expertise to manage.

1️⃣ Direct Control Over Compute & Models

  • SageMaker provides full control over infrastructure, allowing data scientists and ML engineers to train, fine-tune, and deploy models using dedicated compute resources (e.g., GPU instances).
  • Users choose instance types, frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch, MXNet), and manually configure infrastructure settings.

2️⃣ Custom Model Training & Deployment

  • Users can bring their own models or fine-tune pre-trained models with custom datasets.
  • SageMaker provides end-to-end model lifecycle management, from data processing to monitoring deployed models.

3️⃣ Requires ML Expertise & Engineering Effort

  • SageMaker is designed for data scientists, ML engineers, and developers who need deep control over model performance, tuning, and infrastructure optimizations.
  • It is not a no-code/low-code solution—users must configure ML pipelines, data preparation, and model training.

✅ Bedrock: Amazon Bedrock is called a Middle Layer because it abstracts ML infrastructure complexities and provides AI capabilities as an easy-to-use API, sitting between raw compute (SageMaker) and AI-powered business applications.

1️⃣ Pre-Built Foundation Models (FMs) as a Service

  • Unlike SageMaker, Bedrock does not require managing infrastructure.
  • It offers pre-trained generative AI models (Anthropic Claude, Amazon Titan, Meta Llama, etc.) that can be used directly via APIs.

2️⃣ No Need for Model Training or Fine-Tuning (But Possible)

  • Bedrock allows businesses to consume AI models via API calls without the need for training infrastructure.
  • However, fine-tuning is possible via RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) or custom data tuning, but the complexity is hidden from users.

3️⃣ Built for Business & Application Integration

  • Designed for software developers, business users, and enterprises that want to integrate generative AI quickly without dealing with ML complexities.
  • Provides guardrails, security, and compliance features for enterprise adoption.


🔹 How to Position This for Senior Leaders?

SageMaker is for AI builders who need full control over models, training, and infrastructure. It’s like renting a data center where you configure everything.


Bedrock is for businesses that want to use AI without worrying about infrastructure. It’s like consuming AI as a plug-and-play service, similar to how we use SaaS applications.

Think of SageMaker as AWS EC2 (compute for ML) and Bedrock as a managed AI SaaS, like OpenAI's ChatGPT API.


🔹 Key Analogy to Explain to Senior Leaders

FeatureSageMaker (Infrastructure Layer)Bedrock (Middle Layer)
Who Uses It?Data Scientists, ML EngineersDevelopers, Business Users
CustomizationFull control over training & infraPre-trained models with API access
Model OptionsCustom models & pre-trained modelsFully managed GenAI models
Infrastructure ManagementRequired (compute, storage, scaling)Hidden from users (fully managed)
Ease of UseRequires ML expertiseNo ML expertise needed
Use CaseCustom AI/ML developmentFast AI integration into apps
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Error: could not find function "read.xlsx" while reading .xlsx file in R

Got this during the execution of following command in R > dat Error: could not find function "read.xlsx" Tried following command > install.packages("xlsx", dependencies = TRUE) Installing package into ‘C:/Users/amajumde/Documents/R/win-library/3.2’ (as ‘lib’ is unspecified) also installing the dependencies ‘rJava’, ‘xlsxjars’ trying URL 'https://cran.rstudio.com/bin/windows/contrib/3.2/rJava_0.9-8.zip' Content type 'application/zip' length 766972 bytes (748 KB) downloaded 748 KB trying URL 'https://cran.rstudio.com/bin/windows/contrib/3.2/xlsxjars_0.6.1.zip' Content type 'application/zip' length 9485170 bytes (9.0 MB) downloaded 9.0 MB trying URL 'https://cran.rstudio.com/bin/windows/contrib/3.2/xlsx_0.5.7.zip' Content type 'application/zip' length 400968 bytes (391 KB) downloaded 391 KB package ‘rJava’ successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked package ‘xlsxjars’ successfully unpacked ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is Tensor Parallelism and relationship between Buffer and GPU

  Tensor Parallelism in GPU Tensor parallelism is a technique used to distribute the computation of large tensor operations across multiple GPUs or multiple cores within a GPU .   It is an essential method for improving the performance and scalability of deep learning models, particularly when dealing with very large models that cannot fit into the memory of a single GPU. Key Concepts Tensor Operations : Tensors are multidimensional arrays used extensively in deep learning. Common tensor operations include matrix multiplication, convolution, and element-wise operations. Parallelism : Parallelism involves dividing a task into smaller sub-tasks that can be executed simultaneously. This approach leverages the parallel processing capabilities of GPUs to speed up computations. How Tensor Parallelism Works Splitting Tensors : The core idea of tensor parallelism is to split large tensors into smaller chunks that can be processed in parallel. Each chunk is assigned to a different GP...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the benefit of using Quantization in LLM

Quantization is a technique used in LLMs (Large Language Models) to reduce the memory requirements for storing and training the model parameters. It involves reducing the precision of the model weights from 32-bit floating-point numbers (FP32) to lower precision formats, such as 16-bit floating-point numbers (FP16) or 8-bit integers (INT8). Bottomline: You can use Quantization to reduce the memory footprint off the model during the training. The usage of quantization in LLMs offers several benefits: Memory Reduction: By reducing the precision of the model weights, quantization significantly reduces the memory footprint required to store the parameters. This is particularly important for LLMs, which can have billions or even trillions of parameters. Quantization allows these models to fit within the memory constraints of GPUs or other hardware accelerators. Training Efficiency: Quantization can also improve the training efficiency of LLMs. Lower precision formats require fewer computati...
Post a Comment
Read more